Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 205W)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2520 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5700X +32525%
10.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Dec 2019
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1243 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
40
40
Shading Units
2560
4
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.6 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
326.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.89 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.44 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
652.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Navi 10
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
205W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy