Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 270 1024SP +5818%
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Mar 2015
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1024
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Pitcairn
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy