ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA TITAN Ada
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 800W)
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
18392 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
TITAN Ada
+290212%
92.9 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
1.15TB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
144
40
Shading Units
18432
4
TMUs
576
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
144
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1452 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
92.90 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.90 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1452 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
800W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
AD102
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
AD102-450-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
