Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
16856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +193900%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2024
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1665 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
192GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
40
Shading Units
16896
4
TMUs
528
4
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
1000W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GB100
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
208 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy