ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5336 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XT
+201493%
64.51 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3000 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
20GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
84
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
5376
4
TMUs
336
4
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
84
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
80 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
576.0 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1008 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
129.0 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.51 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.016 TFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a
2x DisplayPort 2.1
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Navi 31
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT+
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
