Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD FirePro D300

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1240 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
FirePro D300 +6700%
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2014
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1280
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Pitcairn
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy