ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI350X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI350X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 1000W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI350X 's Advantages
Released 16 years late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (8.19TB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
19416 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI350X
+255275%
81.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2025
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
288GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
8.19TB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
19456
4
TMUs
1216
4
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2553.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
1000W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram X
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
CDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
3 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
153 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
N/A
