ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs ATI FirePro V8800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 208W)
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
FirePro V8800
+8150%
2.64 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Apr 2010
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1600
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
208W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Cypress
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0
