ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (256GB vs 128GB)
40 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1650 GT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2007
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
-
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
RV560
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
RV560 GT
TeraScale
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.312 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0
