ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
760 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
+3025%
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2008
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
800
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
RV770
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
