ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
920 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
+6487%
2.108 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1033 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
960
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.96 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.108 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
87.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GK106
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
