ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA NVS 510
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 2GB VRAM NVS 510 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 35W)
NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
NVS 510
+856%
0.306 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Oct 2012
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
192
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GK107
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
