Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA PG506 242

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA PG506 242

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 24GB VRAM PG506 242 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
PG506 242 +32150%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
40
Shading Units
3584
4
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
165W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GA100
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy