Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon 550X

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon 550X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 2GB VRAM Radeon 550X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
AMD Radeon 550X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1218MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon 550X +3796%
1.247 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Mar 2019
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1082 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1218 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.49 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.98 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1247 GFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1247 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
77.95 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Lexa
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO (215-0904018)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy