Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 32W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300 +9690%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
32bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Navi 24
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Navi 24
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy