ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon R7 250XE
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250XE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 80W)
AMD Radeon R7 250XE 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
600 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250XE
+3340%
1.101 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Aug 2014
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
640
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.76 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1101 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
68.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Cape Verde
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
