ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs ATI Radeon X800 GT AGP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 256MB VRAM Radeon X800 GT AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
40 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (32W vs 40W)
ATI Radeon X800 GT AGP 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (31.55GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon R400 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
493 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
31.55GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
-
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.784 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.784 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
40W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x Molex
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
R420
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
R420 GT
(215RAACGA12F)
TeraScale
Architecture
R400
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.16 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
281 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0b (9_2)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
-
