Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon RX 560 XT

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon RX 560 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon RX 560 XT 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1226MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 560 XT +13631%
4.394 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Mar 2019
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1074 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1226 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1792
4
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.23 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
137.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.394 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.394 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
274.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Ellesmere
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Polaris 10 LE1
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy