Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3032 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700 +99743%
31.95 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2023
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
48
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
3072
4
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
190W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Navi 32
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Navi 32
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy