Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 24GB VRAM TITAN RTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 280W)
NVIDIA TITAN RTX 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4568 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
TITAN RTX +50868%
16.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Dec 2018
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
72
40
Shading Units
4608
4
TMUs
288
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
509.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.62 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.31 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
509.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
280W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
TU102
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
TU102-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy