ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 265W)
AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1712 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 x2
+4021%
3.297 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Feb 2016
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro Server
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
265W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
Tonga
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
Cloudy Tau
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
5 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5
