ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (17W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
More VRAM (640GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
+236%
0.269 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
640MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
80
Shading Units
112
8
TMUs
28
4
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
17W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
G80
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
5.0
Shader Model
4.0
