ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA P102 100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 5GB VRAM P102 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 250W)
NVIDIA P102 100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1683MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
3120 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
P102 100
+13362%
10.77 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Feb 2018
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1582 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1376 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
5GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
440.3GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
25
80
Shading Units
3200
8
TMUs
200
4
ROPs
80
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
0 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
134.6 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
168.3 GFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.77 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
336.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
GP102
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
GP102-100-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
