Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA RTX A1000

ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA RTX A1000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 8GB VRAM RTX A1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX A1000 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1462MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2224 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 +8321%
6.737 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Apr 2024
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
727 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1462 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
18
80
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
72
-
RT Cores
18
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.78 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.737 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.737 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
105.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

17W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cedar
GPU Name
GA107
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.0
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net