Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
200 additional rendering cores
Intel UHD Graphics 630 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1150MHz vs 905MHz)
Lower TDP (15W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300 +64%
0.695 TFLOPS
UHD Graphics 630
0.423 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2020
Trinity
Generation
HD Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
350 MHz
905 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
184
24
TMUs
23
8
ROPs
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.450 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.45 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
846.4 GFLOPS
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
423.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
105.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
Comet Lake GT2
A300
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Generation 9.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
32 nm
Process Size
14 nm+++
1.303 billion
Transistors
Unknown
246 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy