Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs AMD Radeon 760M

AMD FirePro A300 vs AMD Radeon 760M

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 760M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon 760M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 187% (2599MHz vs 905MHz)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300
0.695 TFLOPS
Radeon 760M +665%
5.323 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2023
Trinity
Generation
Navi III IGP(Phoenix Mobile)
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
905 MHz
Boost Clock
2599 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

6
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.58 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
83.17 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.65 TFLOPS
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.323 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
332.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
Phoenix
A300
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
32 nm
Process Size
4 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
25.39 billion
246 mm²
Die Size
178 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy