Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs Intel Arc A350

AMD FirePro D300 vs Intel Arc A350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
Arc A350 +41%
3.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
DG2-128
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy