Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs Intel Iris Graphics 5100

AMD FirePro D300 vs Intel Iris Graphics 5100

We compared a Desktop platform GPU: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Graphics 5100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
960 additional rendering cores
Intel Iris Graphics 5100 's Advantages
Boost Clock1100MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300 +209%
2.176 TFLOPS
Iris Graphics 5100
0.704 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
May 2013
FirePro
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Desktop
Type
Integrated
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
System Shared
GDDR5
Memory Type
System Shared
256bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
704.0 GFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
176.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Haswell GT3
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 7.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
22 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.3 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
181 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.0
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy