Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs Intel Arc Pro A50

AMD FirePro D300 vs Intel Arc Pro A50

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A50 +121%
4.813 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Aug 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
DG2-128
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy