Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

AMD FirePro D300 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 150W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jan 2008
FirePro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV380
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy