Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs AMD FirePro V5900

AMD FirePro D300 vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300 +254%
2.176 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
May 2011
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Cayman
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy