Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
1040 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300 +207%
2.176 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
1280
Shading Units
240
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
204W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GT200B
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy