Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB

AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 6 GB +90%
4.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Sep 2013
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
863 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
2304
80
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.30 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
173.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.156 TFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
173.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GK110B
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
GK110-301-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy