Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs Intel H3C XG310

AMD FirePro D300 vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
H3C XG310 +9%
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Nov 2020
FirePro
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
DG1
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
212 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy