Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

AMD FirePro D300 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X +295%
8.602 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jun 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
64
1280
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Fiji
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
275W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy