Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

AMD FirePro D300 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
18176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI325X +3655%
81.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Oct 2024
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
19456
80
TMUs
1216
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
750W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
153 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy