Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

AMD FirePro D300 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700 +1368%
31.95 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Nov 2023
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
48
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
3072
80
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
190W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Navi 32
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Navi 32
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy