Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP

AMD FirePro D300 vs AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 896SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (85W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300 +10%
2.176 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360 896SP
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jun 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
14
1280
Shading Units
896
80
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Tobago
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Tobago XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
85W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy