Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D500 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

AMD FirePro D500 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D500 's Advantages
Lower TDP (274W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 243.8GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D500
2.227 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6900X +888%
22.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Aug 2021
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2150 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
243.8GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
24
Compute Units
80
1536
Shading Units
5120
96
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
275.2 GPixel/s
69.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
688.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.03 TFLOPS
2.227 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.02 TFLOPS
556.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1376 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 21
Tahiti LE GL
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

274W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy