Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D500 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

AMD FirePro D500 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D500 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.8GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D500 +17%
2.227 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Mar 2015
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
243.8GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

24
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
1024
96
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
69.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.227 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
556.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Tahiti LE GL
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy