AMD FirePro M3100 vs Intel Arc A380M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3100 and 6GB VRAM Arc A380M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A380M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 186% (2000MHz vs 700MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M3100
0.537 TFLOPS
Arc A380M
+662%
4.096 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.1)
Clock Speeds
650 MHz
Base Clock
1550 MHz
700 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
16.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Mars
GPU Name
DG2-128
Mars M2 LP
(216-0842009)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.6
