AMD FirePro M4000 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4000 and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M4000
0.691 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+1687%
12.35 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
512
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
33W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Chelsea
GPU Name
AD107
Chelsea XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
