Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M4100 vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

AMD FirePro M4100 vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M4100 and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M4100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M4100 +33%
0.514 TFLOPS
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jun 2009
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
4
384
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.360 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
16.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
514.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
32.16 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Mars
GPU Name
RV730
Mars M2 PRO/LP (216-0842009)
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
30W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy