Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M5950 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

AMD FirePro M5950 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M5950 and 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M5950 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M5950
0.696 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A30M +488%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Aug 2022
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
17.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
696.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Whistler
GPU Name
DG2-128
Whistler XT GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy