Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M5950 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

AMD FirePro M5950 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M5950 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M5950 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M5950
0.696 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250 +14%
0.797 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
937 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
480
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
17.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
696.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Whistler
GPU Name
GP108B
Whistler XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy