Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M5950 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

AMD FirePro M5950 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M5950 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M5950 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
1568 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M5950
0.696 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +434%
3.723 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
2048
24
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.09 GPixel/s
17.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
116.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.723 TFLOPS
696.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.723 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
232.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Whistler
GPU Name
Amethyst
Whistler XT GL
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
5 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy