Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M6000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT

AMD FirePro M6000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 9650M GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 43W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M6000 +1104%
1.024 TFLOPS
GeForce 9650M GT
0.085 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2012
Release Date
Aug 2008
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 9M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
640
Shading Units
32
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
32.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1024 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
84.80 GFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

43W
TDP
23W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Heathrow
GPU Name
G96C
Heathrow XT GL (216-0835033)
GPU Variant
NB9P-GT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy