Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M6000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q

AMD FirePro M6000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
9088 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090 Max Q +2664%
28.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2012
Release Date
Jan 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
640
Shading Units
9728
40
TMUs
304
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
163.0 GPixel/s
32.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
442.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.31 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
28.31 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
442.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Heathrow
GPU Name
AD103
Heathrow XT GL (216-0835033)
GPU Variant
GN21-X11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy