Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M6000 vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M

AMD FirePro M6000 vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 and 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
624 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (11W vs 43W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M6000 +2525%
1.024 TFLOPS
NVS 2100M
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2012
Release Date
Jan 2010
FirePro Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
640
Shading Units
16
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.140 GPixel/s
32.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.280 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1024 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

43W
TDP
11W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Heathrow
GPU Name
GT218
Heathrow XT GL (216-0835033)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy