Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M6000 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

AMD FirePro M6000 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1350MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 64 +980%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2012
Release Date
Jun 2017
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1250 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
786 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
402.4GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
4096
40
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
32.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
345.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
691.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Heathrow
GPU Name
Vega 10
Heathrow XT GL (216-0835033)
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy